Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) serves as a publication medium for high-quality scientific research resulting from various geological studies and scientific investigations.

The journal publishes articles covering the fields of Geo-sciences, Geo-resources, Geo-hazards, and Geo-environments.

• Geo-sciences encompass the fundamental earth sciences, including geology, geophysics, and geochemistry.
• Geo-resources cover applied earth sciences related to geological resources.
• Geo-hazards focus on applied earth sciences concerning geological hazards and disaster-related studies.
• Geo-environments include applied earth sciences emphasizing environmental geology and related environmental issues.

 

1. Peer Review Process

All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) undergo a peer-review process conducted by qualified reviewers.

The journal implements a double-blind review system, whereby reviewers do not know the identity of the authors, and authors do not know the identity of the reviewers.

During the review process, reviewers evaluate:

• The consistency and relevance between the title, abstract, discussion (findings), and conclusions.
• The novelty and originality of the research.
• The scientific contribution and impact of the study.
• The adequacy and relevance of the references used.

Based on reviewers’ recommendations, the Editor may reach one of the following decisions:

• Accept Submission
• Revisions Required
• Resubmit for Review
• Resubmit Elsewhere
• Decline Submission

A manuscript may be rejected for publication for several reasons, including:

• The manuscript is outside the scope of the journal.
• The manuscript does not comply with the journal’s author guidelines or scientific writing standards.
• Fundamental methodological flaws are identified.
• The author refuses to implement reviewers’ recommendations without a reasonable justification.
• The manuscript contains indications of plagiarism exceeding 20%.

 

2. Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making scientific research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) adopts the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC) License.

Under this license:

2.1. Attribution

Users must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate whether changes have been made. Such attribution may be provided in any reasonable manner, provided it does not suggest endorsement by the licensor.

2.2. NonCommercial

Users may not use the material for commercial purposes.

 

3. Publication Ethics

Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) is committed to maintaining a high-quality peer-reviewed publication platform and serving as an authoritative source of scientific information.

The journal publishes original research articles, review papers, and case studies focusing on geo-sciences, geo-resources, geo-hazards, geo-environments, and related disciplines. Submitted manuscripts must not have been previously published in any language nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere.

This statement outlines the ethical responsibilities of all parties involved in the publication process, including authors, editors, reviewers, and the publisher, namely Pusat Survei Geologi, Badan Geologi, Kementerian Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral. These guidelines are based on the COPE Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

 

4. Allegations of Research Misconduct

Research misconduct includes fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, plagiarism, or other unethical practices in conducting, reporting, reviewing, or publishing research.

Editors are responsible for safeguarding the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record. If allegations of misconduct arise, the Editors and Editorial Board will follow COPE guidelines to investigate and resolve the matter fairly and transparently.

Any manuscript found to contain research misconduct will be rejected. If misconduct is discovered after publication, the journal may issue a correction, retraction, or other appropriate notice linked to the original article.

The investigation process includes:

• Verification of the allegation.
• Assessment of whether the allegation falls within the definition of research misconduct.
• Evaluation of potential conflicts of interest among complainants.
• Communication with the corresponding author on behalf of all co-authors.
• Review of the author’s explanation and supporting evidence.
• Additional expert evaluation where necessary, including statistical review.

Institutions are expected to conduct thorough investigations when allegations of misconduct involve their researchers. Through appropriate actions, including corrections and retractions when necessary, JGSM remains committed to maintaining the validity and integrity of the scientific record.

 

5. Complaints and Appeals

JGSM maintains a clear procedure for handling complaints and appeals concerning the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board, or Publisher.

Complaints may involve matters such as:

• Editorial process concerns.
• Citation manipulation.
• Unfair editorial or reviewer practices.
• Peer-review manipulation.
• Other issues related to the journal’s publication process.

All complaints will be handled in accordance with COPE guidelines and addressed fairly and professionally.

 

6. Ethical Oversight

If research involves chemicals, human participants, animals, procedures, or equipment with unusual hazards, authors must clearly identify these aspects within the manuscript and ensure compliance with applicable ethical standards.

Where required, authors must provide evidence of ethical approval or clearance from relevant institutions or regulatory bodies.

For studies involving confidential data, business information, or proprietary practices, authors must clearly explain how such information is protected and managed.

 

7. Duties of Authors

7.1. Reporting Standards

Authors must present an accurate account of the research conducted and provide an objective discussion of its significance. Research findings should be reported honestly without fabrication, falsification, or inappropriate data manipulation. Manuscripts must contain sufficient detail and references to enable replication of the work.

7.2. Originality and Plagiarism

Authors must ensure that submitted work is entirely original. Manuscripts must not be submitted simultaneously to more than one publication unless agreed upon by the editors. All relevant previous works must be appropriately cited and acknowledged.

7.3. Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publications

Authors should not submit the same manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously. Redundant publication of substantially similar research is considered unethical. Multiple publications arising from the same research project must clearly identify the primary publication.

7.4. Acknowledgement of Sources

All sources of information and data used in the research must be properly acknowledged. Publications that have influenced the reported work should be cited appropriately.

7.5. Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should accurately reflect each individual’s contribution to the research and manuscript preparation. Only those who have made significant contributions should be listed as authors. All authors must approve the final manuscript before submission.

7.6. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could influence the interpretation of the research. Sources of financial support must also be acknowledged.

7.7. Fundamental Errors in Published Works

If authors discover significant errors in their published work, they must promptly notify the Editor and cooperate in correcting or retracting the publication.

7.8. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

Authors must clearly identify any hazardous materials, procedures, or equipment involved in the study and ensure compliance with ethical standards governing research involving humans or animals.

 

8. Duties of Editors

8.1. Publication Decisions

Editors are responsible for deciding whether submitted manuscripts should be accepted, revised, or rejected based on reviewers’ recommendations, scientific merit, journal policies, and applicable legal requirements.

8.2. Review of Manuscripts

Editors must ensure that manuscripts are evaluated fairly and undergo an appropriate peer-review process. Reviewers should be selected based on expertise and the absence of conflicts of interest.

8.3. Fair Play

Editorial decisions must be made solely on the basis of intellectual content without discrimination regarding gender, race, religion, citizenship, or other personal characteristics of the authors.

8.4. Confidentiality

Editors must maintain the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts and ensure the protection of sensitive information throughout the editorial process.

8.5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Editors must not use unpublished information obtained through manuscript submissions for personal research or gain without written permission from the authors.

 

9. Duties of Reviewers

9.1. Confidentiality

Reviewers must treat all manuscripts as confidential documents and must not disclose or discuss them with unauthorized parties.

9.2. Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published works not cited by the authors and alert the Editor to any suspected plagiarism, duplication, or ethical concerns.

9.3. Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively, with observations supported by clear arguments and constructive recommendations that assist authors in improving their manuscripts.

9.4. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

Reviewers must not evaluate manuscripts where conflicts of interest exist. Any potential conflicts should be disclosed to the Editor immediately.

9.5. Promptness

Reviewers should complete evaluations within the agreed timeframe. If unable to do so, they must promptly notify the Editor so that alternative arrangements can be made.

 

10. Plagiarism Checker

All manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) undergo plagiarism screening using Turnitin during the initial submission assessment and again prior to publication.

 

11. Reference Management

For citation and bibliography management, Jurnal Geologi dan Sumberdaya Mineral (JGSM) recommends the use of Mendeley Reference Management Software to ensure consistency and accuracy in referencing.