Pengembangan Wisata Berbasis Geopark dan Sumber Daya Manusia Pengelola Geopark di Indonesia: Pendekatan Social Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE)

Authors

  • Nendi Rohaendi PPSDM Geominerba - KESDM Author https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7354-9171
  • Irmayanti Irmayanti London School Public Relation Communication and Bussiness Institute Author
  • Hendris Agung Prasodjo PPSDMA Aparatur KESDM Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52596/ja.v7i1.182

Keywords:

Geowisata, Geopark, SMCE.

Abstract

ABSTRAK

Pengembangan wisata dikawasan geopark terkait dengan kompetensi pengelola geopark. Tujuan studi ini adalah melakukan analisis faktor yang mempengaruhi pengembangan wisata di kawasan geopark dan kaitannya dengan sumber daya manusia dengan menggunakan metode Social Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE). SMCE adalah suatu metode pengambilan keputusan berbasis multi kriteria analisis yang mempertimbangkan aspek sosial dari suatu masalah. 10 kriteria sosial yang dijadikan faktor analisis dan dikembangkan tiga skenario utama yaitu optimis, moderat, dan pesimis. AHP digunakan untuk pembobotan setiap kriteria yang ada. Aksesibilitas dan fasilitas/akomodasi mempunyai nilai tertinggi, kemudian keselamatan dan keamanan serta dukungan pemerintah, selanjutnya pengelola geopark, promosi, informasi, dan partisipasi masyarakat, dan terakhir adalah potensi wisatawan local dan mancanegara. Kesimpulannya adalah SMCE berbasis AHP dapat digunakan untuk penilaian pengembangan wisata berbasis geopark di Indonesia.

Author Biographies

  • Nendi Rohaendi, PPSDM Geominerba - KESDM
    widyaiswara
  • Hendris Agung Prasodjo, PPSDMA Aparatur KESDM
    Widyaiswara Madya di PPSDMA Aparatur

References

Borzoni, M., Rizzi, F., & Frey, M. (2014). Geothermal power in Italy: A social multi-criteria evaluation. Renewable Energy, 69, 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.03.026

Cahyadi, H. S., & Newsome, D. (2021). International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks The post COVID-19 tourism dilemma for geoparks in Indonesia. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.02.003

Daniawan, B. (2018). Evaluation of Lecturer Teaching Performance Using AHP and SAW Methods. Bit-Tech, 1(2), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.32877/bt.v1i2.41

Desiana, P. M. (2022). Fuzzy Ahp To Prioritize Strategy for Social Enterprises’ Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Science and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.7454/jessd.v5i1.1142

Etxano, I., & Villalba-Eguiluz, U. (2021). Twenty-five years of social multi-criteria evaluation (SMCE) in the search for sustainability: Analysis of case studies. Ecological Economics, 188(June), 107131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107131

Gamboa, G. (2006). Social multi-criteria evaluation of different development scenarios of the Aysén region, Chile. Ecological Economics, 59(1), 157–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.014

Gamboa, G., & Munda, G. (2007). The problem of windfarm location: A social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy, 35(3), 1564–1583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.04.021

Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 1–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143

Mohammed, H. J., Kasim, M. M., & Shaharanee, I. N. (2018). Evaluation of E-learning approaches using AHP-TOPSIS technique. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 10(1–10), 7–10.

Munda, G. (2004). Social multi-criteria evaluation: Methodological foundations and operational consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), 662–677. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00369-2

Munda, G. (2008). Social multi-criteria evaluation for a sustainable economy. In Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2

Muslim, D., Zakaria, Z., Rachmat, H., Iqbal, P., Muslim, G. O., Sadewo, M. S., & Muslim, F. N. (2022). Identification of Geodiversity and Geosite Assessment around Geohazard Area of Suoh Aspiring Geopark in West Lampung, Sumatra, Indonesia. Resources, 11(11), 104. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources11110104

Perez-romero, M. E., Ãlvarez-García, J., Flores-Romero, M. B., & Jiménez-Islas, D. (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks 22 Years after Their Creation : Analysis of Scientific Production. Land, MDPI, 12(March), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030671

Rohaendi, N., Prasodjo, H. A., Adinugraha, W., & Salajar, R. T. (2022). Evaluasi Penyelenggaraan Diklat Teknis di PPSDM GEOMINERBA dengan Menggunakan Metode AHP-TOPSIS. Jurnal Aparatur, 1–11.

Rohaendi, N., Salajar, R. T., Prata, D. A., & Oktariadi, O. (2022). Mining-based tourism in Sawahlunto National Geopark. International Journal of Applied Science in Tourism and Events, 6(2), 151–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31940/ijaste.v6i2.151-163

Rohaendi, N., Sukiyah, E., Muslim, D., & Cipta, A. (2021). Geotourism Land Suitability Analysis of Citatah Karst Area in Bandung Basin Using Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation (SMCE). Geojournal of Tourism and Geosites, 39(4), 1346–1353. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.394spl04-777

Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process-what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3–5), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

Yanuar, Y., Anna, Z., Hindayani, P., Rosana, M. F., Sudradjat, A., & Zakaria, Z. (2018). PROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY OF GEOPARK TOURISM OF CILETUH-PALABUHANRATU WEST JAVA INDONESIA. International Journal of Current Innovation Research, 4(February 2018), 1033–1039. https://doi.org/10.24327/IJCIR

Downloads

Published

2023-07-28