Studi Eksploratori Gagasan Kepemimpinan Sektor Publik dari Sudut Pandang Pegawai Negeri Sipil (PNS) Indonesia

Authors

  • Muhammad Aidil Fitriansyah Usman Universitas Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52596/ja.v6i2.166

Abstract

Kepemimpinan adalah salah satu faktor penentu bagi organisasi sektor publik untuk mencapai target dan tujuannya. Dasar utama efektifitas kepemimpinan bukanlah pengangkatan tetapi penerimaan orang lain atas kepemimpinan yang bersangkutan. Studi tentang kepemimpinan telah banyak dilakukan, namun penelitian yang mengeksplorasi kepemimpinan dari perspektif emic yaitu anggota atau komunitas yang menjadi subjek penelitian masih terbatas. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi makna kepemimpinan pada Instansi Pemerintah dari sudut pandang PNS sebagai objek yang dipimpin. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif interpretivis, wawancara mendalam semi-terstruktur dilakukan kepada 27 pegawai negeri sipil dari instansi pemerintah pusat, dan data dianalisis menggunakan analisis tematik. Penelitian ini menghasilkan tiga gagasan kepemimpinan yang beragam dari sudut pandang PNS yaitu: (1) PNS merindukan pemimpin yang humanis, (2) PNS merindukan pemimpin yang terlibat langsung dalam pelaksanaan tugas, serta (3) PNS merindukan pemimpin lintas generasi. Studi ini menawarkan panduan bagi organisasi sektor publik para pemimpin di sektor publik di Indonesia dengan mengidentifikasi gagasan kepemimpinan pada Instansi Pemerintah dari sudut pandang PNS. Kontribusi utama penelitian ini, yaitu memperkaya kajian literatur tentang gagasan kepemimpinan di sektor publik dengan pendekatan eksploratori para objek yang dipimpin di lingkungan Instansi Pemerintah.

Author Biography

  • Muhammad Aidil Fitriansyah Usman, Universitas Indonesia
    Magister Manajemen, Fakutas Ekonomi dan Bisnis

References

Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Farahnak, L. R., Sklar, M., & Horowitz, J. (2017). Discrepancies in Leader and Follower Ratings of Transformational Leadership: Relationship with Organizational Culture in Mental Health. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 44(4), 480–491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0672-7

Akram, T., Lei, S., Hussain, S. T., Haider, M. J., & Akram, M. W. (2016). Does relational leadership generate organizational social capital? A case of exploring the effect of relational leadership on organizational social capital in China. Future Business Journal, 2(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbj.2016.06.001

Alvesson, M. (2019). Waiting for Godot: Eight major problems in the odd field of leadership studies. Leadership, 15(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715017736707

Andreescu, V., & Vito, G. F. (2010). An Exploratory Study on Ideal Leadership Behaviour: The Opinions of American Police Managers. International Journal of Police Science and Management, 12(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1350/ijps.2010.12.4.207

Andriani, R. D. (2021). Strategi Pemimpin Dalam Digital Leadership Di Era Disrupsi Digital. Al-Irsyad, 11(1), 58. https://doi.org/10.30829/al-irsyad.v11i1.9333

Arnold, J., Cooper, C. L., & Robertson, I. T. (1998). Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the work place. London: Financial Times Pitman.

Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Reâ€examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 72(4), 441-462.

Avolio, B. J. & Bass, B. M. (2004). Multifactor leadership questionnaire. Manual and sampler set. (3rd ed.) Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden.

Aziz, Siti Fardaniah Abdul; Silong, Abu Daud; Karim, Nor Akmar Abdul; Hassan, H. (2012). Leadership Practices in Public Sector in Selected Countries: An Integrative Literature Review. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 13(1), 113–126. http://www.na-businesspress.com/JMPP/AzizSFA_Web13_1_.pdf

Bass, B., & Bass, R. (2008). The bass handbook of leadership: Theory, research, and managerial applications (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

Bass, B. M., Avolio, B. J., Jung, D. I., & Berson, Y. (2003). Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.207

Berdahl, J. L., Cooper, M., Glick, P., Livingston, R. W., & Williams, J. C. (2018). Work as a masculinity contest. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 422–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12289

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology, qualitative research in psychology. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 3(2), 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Hayfield, N., & Terry, G. (2019). Thematic analysis. Handbook of Research Methods in Health Social Sciences, 843–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_103

Charmaz, K. (2020). “With constructivist grounded theory you can’t hideâ€: Social justice research and critical inquiry in the public sphere. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419879081

Chou, W. J., Sibley, C. G., Liu, J. H., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2015). Paternalistic Leadership Profiles: A Person-Centered Approach. Group and Organization Management, 40(5), 685–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601115573358

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Daft, R.L. 2005. The Leadership experience (3rd ed.). Mason, Ohio: Thomson Southwestern.

Duho, K. C. T., Amankwa, M. O., & Musah-Surugu, J. I. (2020). Determinants and convergence of government effectiveness in Africa and Asia. Public Administration and Policy, 23(2), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-12-2019-0039

Elliott, S., Bevan, N., & Litchfield, C. (2020). Parents, girls’ and Australian football: a constructivist grounded theory for attracting and retaining participation. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 12(3), 392–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1602560

Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 659–676. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.4.659

Fanani, A. F., Iqbal, M. M., Astutik, W., & Lestari, Y. (2020). Kepemimpinan Transformasional Sektor Publik. JPSI (Journal of Public Sector Innovations), 4(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpsi.v4n2.p84-90

Farh, J.-L., & Cheng, B.-S. (2000). A Cultural Analysis of Paternalistic Leadership in Chinese Organizations. Management and Organizations in the Chinese Context, 84–127. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230511590_5

Fukushige, A., & Spicer, D. P. (2007). Leadership preferences in Japan: An exploratory study. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 28(6), 508–530. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437730710780967

Ghadi, M. Y., Fernando, M., & Caputi, P. (2013). Transformational leadership and work engagement: The mediating effect of meaning in work. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 34(6), 532–550. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-10-2011-0110

Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., Donnelly J. H., & Konopaske, R. (2012). Organizations: Behaviour, structure, processes. (14th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Glick, P., Berdahl, J. L., & Alonso, N. M. (2018). Development and validation of the masculinity contest culture scale. Journal of Social Issues, 74(3), 449–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12280

Hargis, M. B., Watt, J. D., & Piotrowski, C. (2011). Developing laders: Examining the role of transactional and transformational leadership across business contexts. Organization Development Journal, 29(3), 51–66.

Holloway, I., & Wheeler, S. (2002). The nature of qualitative research: Development and perspectives. Qualitative Research in Nursing, 3-25.

Irawanto, D. W., Ramsey, P. L., & Tweed, D. C. (2012). Exploring paternalistic leadership and its application to the Indonesian public sector. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 8(1), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/17479881211230637

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VII: Aggregate and individual governance indicators 1996-2007. Non-State Actors as Standard Setters, June, 146–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511635519.007

Kellogg, K. C. (2011). Challenging operations: Medical reform and resistance in surgery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kreitner, R., & Kinicki, A. (2013). Organizational Behaviour. (10th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Luthans, F. (2008). Organizational behavior. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091

Northouse, P. G. (2018). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). California: Sage Publication.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Page, M.B. (2016), Public leadership: Navigating leadership challenges and operating in service of the common good in an interconnected world. International Journal of Public Leadership, 12(2), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPL-12-2015-0030

Sari, M. (2018, Juli). Gaya kepemimpinan untuk account representative pada kantor pelayanan pajak di wilayah DKI Jakarta. Tesis. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Suryani, A. O., van de Vijver, F. J. R., Poortinga, Y. H., & Setiadi, B. N. (2012). Indonesian leadership styles: A mixed-methods approach. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(4), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2012.01384.x

Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., dan DeVault, M. L. (2016). Qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

Van Quaquebeke, N., Van Knippenberg, D., & Brodbeck, F. C. (2011). More than meets the eye: The role of subordinates’ self-perceptions in leader categorization processes. Leadership Quarterly, 22(2), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.02.011

Winkler, I. (2009). Contemporary leadership theories: Enhancing the understanding of the complexity, subjectivity and dynamic of leadership. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

World Bank (2022), Government effectiveness. 1 Juli 2022. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/pdf/ge.pdf

Zaccaro, S. J., Kemp, C., & Bader, P. (2017). Leader traits and attributes. In J. Antonakis, A. T. Cianciolo, & R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of leadership (3rd ed., pp. 29–55). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-31