Scaffolding Learning and its Application to Energy Conservation Field Training: A Bibliometric Analysis

Authors

  • Rohmatulloh Rohmatulloh Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Author
  • Nurul Hidayati Murtafiah Universitas Islam An Nur Lampung Author
  • Aspita Dyah Badan Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia Energi dan Sumber Daya Mineral Author
  • M. Tajudin Zuhri Universitas Garut Author
  • Lalan Sahlani Institut Agama Islam Persis Bandung Author
  • Iim Ibrohim Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52596/ja.v7i2.225

Keywords:

Bibliometric analysis, scaffolding learning, training, energy conservation

Abstract

Scaffolding learning in training provides effective and efficient support to learners gradually according to their dynamic assessment achievements. Our contribution is to explore the trend of scaffolding learning in training research that has not been done in previous studies. Bibliometric analysis using Scopus scientific database for two decades (2004-2023). Data analysis used performance analysis, co-word analysis, and network visualization analysis. The results of research theme mapping show that instructional scaffolding has yet to be widely explored. Instructional scaffolding is a topic that provides a challenge for facilitators as a training solution in the field of energy conservation using a combination of learning forms, i.e., one-to-one, peer, and computer-based scaffolding.

References

Al-Khoury, A., Hussein, S. A., Abdulwhab, M., Aljuboori, Z. M., Haddad, H., Ali, M. A., Abed, I. A., & Flayyih, H. H. (2022). Intellectual capital history and trends: A bibliometric analysis using scopus satabase. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811615

Allen, W. C. (2006). Overview and evolution of the ADDIE training system. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 8(4), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1523422306292942

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Belland, B. R. (2017). Instructional scaffolding in STEM education: Strategies and efficacy evidence. Springer Open.

Blanchard, P. N., & Thacker, J. W. (2013). Effective training: System, strategies, and practice. Pearson Education.

Brika, S. K. M., Algamdi, A., Chergui, K., Musa, A. A., & Zouaghi, R. (2021). Quality of higher education: A bibliometric review study. Frontiers in Education, 6(May), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.666087

Davis, E. A. (2015). Scaffolding learning. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Science Education (pp. 845–847). Springer Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0

De Vin, L. J., Jacobsson, L., & Odhe, J. (2019). Simulator-assisted lean production training. Production and Manufacturing Research, 7(1), 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2019.1644248

Djeki, E., Dégila, J., Bondiombouy, C., & Alhassan, M. H. (2022). E-learning bibliometric analysis from 2015 to 2020. Journal of Computers in Education, 9(4), 727–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-021-00218-4

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(May), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070

Gao, Y., Wong, S. L., Mas, M. N., & Noordin, N. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of online faculty professional development in higher education. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-00196-w

Ghani, N. A., Teo, P. C., Ho, T. C. F., Choo, L. S., Kelana, B. W. Y., Adam, S., & Ramliy, M. K. (2022). Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on higher education internationalization using scopus database: Towards sustainability of higher education institutions. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148810

Gibson, P. (2015). Scaffolding language, scaffolding learning: Teaching english language learners in the mainstream classroom. In News.Ge (Vol. 3, Issue April). Heinemann.

Gutiérrez, O. A., Galloway, R. K., Santos, A., Martínez-Huerta, H., & González, H. (2022). Assisted discovery based learning of the electric force with scaffolding for novice students. Education Sciences, 12(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040269

Hoffmann, T. (1999). The meanings of competency. Journal of European Industrial Training, 23(6), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090599910284650

Hurajova, A., Kollarova, D., & Huraj, L. (2022). Trends in education during the pandemic: modern online technologies as a tool for the sustainability of university education in the field of media and communication studies. Heliyon, 8(5), e09367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09367

Jin, J., Hwang, K.-E., & Kim, I. (2020). A study on the constructivism learning method for BIM/IPD collaboration education. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(15), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10155169

Laird, D. (2003). Approaches to training and development: New perspectives in organizational learning, performance, and change. Perseus Publishing.

Lin, T. C., Tang, K. Y., Lin, S. S., Changlai, M. L., & Hsu, Y. S. (2022). A co-word analysis of selected science education literature: Identifying research trends of scaffolding in two decades (2000–2019). Frontiers in Psychology, 13(February), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.844425

Liu, S., & Zhang, S. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of computer-assisted english learning from 2001 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(4), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.24151

Perdima, F. E., Hadiwinarto, & Balint, G. (2022). Evaluation of learning in physical education: A bibliometric analysis and future trends. Journal Sport Area, 7(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.25299/sportarea.2022.vol7(1).8059

Prahani, B. K., Amiruddin, M. Z. Bin, Suprapto, N., Deta, U. A., & Cheng, T.-H. (2022). Trend of physics education research during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(3), 517–533.

Raman, A., Thannimalai, R., Don, Y., & Rathakrishnan, M. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of blended learning in higher education: perception, achievement and engagement. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(6), 126–151. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.6.7

Sarah, L. L., Ananto, Y., Octonary, D., & Nussifera, L. (2022). The Implementation of web based e-scaffolding enhance learning (ESEL) on centre of mass concept understanding. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 8(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v8i1.46476

Shvarts, A., & Bakker, A. (2019). The early history of the scaffolding metaphor: Bernstein, Luria, Vygotsky, and before. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(1), 4–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1574306

Silberman, M. (2006). Active training: A handbook of techniques, design, case examples, ant tips. In Active Training. Pfeiffer. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119154778

Susilowati, E., Mayasari, T., Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., & Kaniawati, I. (2019). Scaffolding learning model to improve habits of mind students. 6th International Seminar on Mathematics, Science, and Computer Science Education, MSCEIS 2018, 1280(5). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/5/052064

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer manual. Univeristeit Leiden. http://www.vosviewer.com/documentation/Manual_VOSviewer_1.6.1.pdf

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Aparatur

Section

Articles