Toward Innovation Hub Excellence: A Scientometric Analysis of Science Techno Parks Worldwide (1982- 2023)

Authors

  • Yoga Perdana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Suryana Suryana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Hari Mulyadi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Budhi Pamungkas Gautama Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author
  • Dibias Lazuardi Maulid Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52596/ja.v7i2.226

Abstract

As part of the university's mission to drive innovation and economic development, the popularity of Science and Technology Parks (STPs) as a policy tool is rising. The synergy between innovative companies and universities is expected to facilitate knowledge exchange, fostering increased innovation. However, the evolution of STPs in diverse contexts and for different purposes has led to a fragmented research landscape, primarily consisting of case studies on individual parks across various disciplines. Drawing on 855 articles from the Scopus database since 1983, this study extracted and evaluated 552 research outcomes using the BibTeX method in the R studio software. Leading the list in terms of Aggregated Article Citations (AAC) are Spain (29.60), Georgia (23.8), China (11.40), and the USA (27.7). The research presents a comprehensive systematic literature review on STPs, shedding light on their evolving relationship with universities and encompassing new topics such as economic development, high-tech industries, innovation, science and technology, sustainable development, technological progress, and technology transfer. A B S T R A K Sebagai bagian dari misi perguruan tinggi untuk mendorong inovasi dan pengembangan ekonomi, popularitas Science and Technology Parks (STPs) sebagai alat kebijakan semakin meningkat. Keterpaduan antara perusahaan inovatif dan perguruan tinggi diharapkan dapat mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan, mendorong peningkatan inovasi. Namun, perkembangan STPs dalam konteks yang beragam dan untuk tujuan yang berbeda telah menghasilkan lanskap penelitian yang terfragmentasi, terutama melalui studi kasus pada STPs individual di berbagai disiplin ilmu. Berdasarkan 855 artikel dari database Scopus sejak tahun 1983, penelitian ini mengekstrak dan mengevaluasi 552 hasil penelitian dengan menggunakan metode BibTeX dalam perangkat lunak R studio. hasil yang diperoleh dari rata-rata kutipan artikel yang terbit menunjukan bahwa Spanyol (29,60), Georgia (23,8), Tiongkok (11,40), dan Amerika Serikat (27,7). Penelitian ini menyajikan tinjauan literatur sistematis yang komprehensif mengenai STPs, memberikan wawasan tentang hubungan mereka yang terus berkembang dengan perguruan tinggi, dan mencakup topik-topik baru seperti pengembangan ekonomi, industri teknologi tinggi, inovasi, ilmu dan teknologi, pembangunan berkelanjutan, kemajuan teknologi, dan transfer teknologi.

References

Abdirahman, Z.-Z., Shiri, G. and Sauvée, L. (2020) ‘Network characteristics and the adoption of

organisational innovation in the food sector’, International Journal of Entrepreneurship

and Innovation Management, 24(4–5), pp. 320 – 338. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEIM.2020.108248.

Caloffi, A. et al. (2023) ‘Innovation intermediaries’ types and functions: A computational

analysis of the literature’, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 189. Available

at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122351.

Da Silva-Etges, A. P. B., & Nogueira-Cortimiglia, M. (2019). A systematic review of risk

management in innovation-oriented firms. Journal of Risk Research, 22(3), 364–381.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2017.1382558

Figueira, S. et al. (2023) ‘Entrepreneurs: Gender and gendered institutions’ effects in open

innovation’, Industrial Marketing Management, 111, pp. 109 – 126. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2023.04.002.

Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: An annotated and

analytical literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976.

https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10961-016-9522-3

IASP - International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation (2020). Definitions

IASP. Retrieved September 3, 2020, from https://www.iasp.ws/our-industry/defnitions

Karpińska, A. (2020) ‘Innovation and science dilemmas. Unintended consequences of

innovation policy for science. Polish experience’, Cogent Social Sciences, 6(1). Available

at: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1718055.

Kitcharoen, K. (2004). The importance-performance analysis of service quality in administrative

departments of private universities in Thailand. ABAC Journal, 24(3), 20–46

Lecluyse, L., Knockaert, M., & Spithoven, A. (2019). The contribution of science parks: A

literature review and future research agenda. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 559–

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-09712-x

Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science parks and the growth of new technology-based firms

- academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research Policy, 31(6), 859–876.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00153-6

Peterková, J., Czerná, K. and Zimmermannová, J. (2022) ‘Innovation Ecosystem in Selected

Regions of the Czech Republic and Poland: Specifics of Infrastructure Supporting Innovative Entrepreneurship’, Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, Series D:

Faculty of Economics and Administration, 30(1). Available at:

https://doi.org/10.46585/sp30011550.

Świadek, A. and Gorączkowska, J. (2020) ‘The institutional support for an innovation

cooperation in industry: The case of Poland’, Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics

and Economic Policy, 15(4), pp. 811 – 831. Available at:

https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2020.035.

Tranfeld, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for evidence-based

management. British Academy of Management, 14, 207–222

UN ESCAP (2019). Establishing Science and Technology Parks: A reference guidebook for policy

makers in Asia and the Pacifc United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia

and the Pacifc (ESCAP). Retrieved October 3, 2022, from

https://repository.unescap.org/bitstream/handle/20.500. 12870/114/ESCAP-2019-MNEstablishing-science-and-technology-parks.pdf?sequence=1

UNESCO (2018). Science and Technology Park Governance: Concept and Defnition United

Nations Educational, Scientifc and Cultural Organization. Retrieved October 3, 2022,

from: http://www. unesco.org/new/en/natural-sciences/science-technology/universityindustrypartnerships/scien ce-parks-around-the-world

Zavale, N., & Langa, P. (2018). University-industry linkage’s literature on Sub-Saharan Africa:

Systematic literature revieww and bibliometric account. Scientometric, 116(1), 1–49.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2760-4

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31