INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT UNTUK REVITALISASI IMPLEMENTASI E-GOVERNMENT DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52596/ja.v4i2.11Keywords:
E-government Revitalization, Sustainable Innovation, Intellectual Capital, Intellectual Capital Management, Revitalisasi e-government, Inovasi BerkelanjutanAbstract
The purpose of this research is to identify the factors influencing implementation of e-government in Indonesia, using the perspective of Intellectual Capital Management. The low ranking of Indonesia's egovernment implementation based on data released by the United Nations, is internally institutional, due to the lack of human resources knowledge of e-government. While, externally institutional factor is caused
by low public awareness of the importance of e-literacy, and other factors that affect the quality of egovernment implementation in Indonesia. A management system is needed that can boost e-government implementation better. Methodology of this research is used a descriptive qualitative approach, data that support research is obtained through the study of literature sourced from relevant books, scientific
journals, scientific articles, and the internet that are relevant to the application of Intellectual Capital Management in order to produce in-depth and comprehensive information, regarding related issues. The result of research showed, that three capitals of ICM that they enggage and support each other in knowledge eternally (human capital, structural capital, and relational capital) is a concept of institutional management with its projected value creation, through knowledge and innovation. It can to increase quality of superior and innovative e-government that contributes to the nation and state of Indonesia positively.
Â
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang berpengaruh terhadap implementasi e-government di Indonesia menggunakan perspektif Intellectual Capital Management. Rendahnya peringkat implementasi e-government Indonesia berdasarkan data yang dirilis oleh PBB, secara internal kelembagaan, disebabkan masih minimnya pengetahuan SDM terhadap e-government.
Adapun secara eksternal kelembagaan disebabkan rendahnya kesadaran masyarakat terhadap pentingnya melek e-literacy, dan faktor-faktor lainnya yang mempengaruhi kualitas implementasi e-government di Indonesia. Diperlukan sebuah sistem manajemen yang dapat mendongkrak terimpelemntasikannya egovernment
dengan lebih baik. Menggunakan metode penelitian dengan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif, data-data yang mendukung penelitian diperoleh melalui studi literatur kepustakaan yang bersumber dari buku-buku yang relevan, jurnal ilmiah, artikel-artikel ilmiah, dan internet yang relevan dengan penerapan Intellectual Capital Management guna menghasilkan informasi yang mendalam dan komprehensif
mengenai permasalahan terkait. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan ICM dengan ketiga elemennya yang saling bersinergi melalui pengetahuan (human capital, structural capital, dan relational capital) merupakan konsep manajemen lembaga dengan proyeksi penciptaan nilai melalui pengetahuan dan inovasi yang dimilikinya dapat meningkatkan kualitas e-government yang unggul dan inovatif yang berkontribusi
positif bagi bangsa dan negara Indonesia.
References
Akpinar, T. A., & Akdemir, A. (2011). Intellectual
Capital. Turkey: Kocaeli University.
Alwis, D. (2004). The Role of Intellectual Capital
in Organisational Value Creation: an
Application of a Theoretical Model to Two
Case Studies. United Kingdom: Brunel
University.
Artinah, B. (2011). Pengaruh Intellectual Capital
Terhadap Profitabilitas (Studi Empiris pada
Perusahaan Perbankan). Socioscientia Jurnal
Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3 No 1, 53.
Boisot, M. (2002). The Strategic Management of
Intellectual Capital and Organizational
Knowledge. (C. W. Choo, & N. Bontis,
Penyunt.) New York: Oxford University Press.
Bontis, N. (1999). Managing Organizational
Knowledge by Diagnosing Intellectual Capital
Framing and Advancing The State of The
Field. International Journal of Technology
Management Vol 18 No 5/6/7/8, 433-62.
Bontis, N. (2000, October 11). Assesing
Knowledge Assets: A Review of The Models
Used to Measure Intellectual Capital. Diambil
kembali dari Assesing Knowledge Assets: A
Review of The Models Used to Measure
I n t e l l e c t u a l C a p i t a l :
http://cieseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?
doi=10.1.1.112.8365&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Budihardjo, A. (2017). Knowledge Management:
Efektif Berinovasi Meraih Sukses. Jakarta:
Prasetya Mulya Publishing.
Caddy, I. (2007). IntellectualCapital and Quality
Management: Strange Bedfellows or New
I n s i g h t s ?
http://www.aair.org.au/app/webroot/media/pdf
/AAIR%20Fora/Forum2007/Caddy.pdf
Chang, A., & Tseng, C.-N. (2005). Building
Customer Capital Through Relationship
Marketing Activities: The case of Taiwanese
Multilevel Marketing Companies. Journal of
Intellectual Capital.
Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator's
Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause
Great Firms to Fail. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Clark, T. R. (2008). Epic Change: How To Lead
Change in The Global Age. San Fransisco:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Clarkson, M. B. (1995). A Stakeholder
Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating
Corporate Social Performance. The Academy
of Management Review, 92-117.
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working
Knowledge: How Organizations Manage
What They Know. Boston: Harvard Business
School Press.
Europian Commision. (2000). Making a Reality of
The Europian Research Area: Guidelines for
EU Research Activities (2002-2006). Brussel:
COM (2000) 612 Final.
Flak, L. S., & Rose, J. (2005). Stakeholder
Governance: Adapting Stakeholder Theory to
E-Government. Communications of the
Association for Information Systems, 662-664.
Fredman, J. P. (2000). Dictionary of Business
Terms. New York: Barron's Educational
Series, Inc.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder Influence
Strategies. Academy of Management Review,
-205.
Geus, A. D. (1997). The Living Company. Boston:
Harvard Bussiness School Press.
Göran, R. (2005). Managing Intellectual Capital
in Practice. Oxford: Elsivier Ltd.
Guah, M. W. (2007). GlobalE-Government:
Theory, Applications, and Benchmarking. (L.
al-Hakim, Penyunt.) Australia: Idea Group
Publishing.
Guthrie, J., & Petty, R. M. (2000). Intellectual
Capital: Australian Annual Reporting
Practices. Journal of Intellectual Capital, I,
-251.Harimurti, R. M. (2010). Dinamika Pengelolaan
Teknologi Informasi Pemerintaha dan Model
Connected Government Sebagai Solusi.
Jurnal Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan
K o m u n i k a s i .
https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/2
-dinamika-pengelolaan-teknologiinformasi-
f76bc43.pdf
Harrison, S., & Sullivan, P. H. (2000). Profiting
form Intellectual Capital: Learning from
Leading Companies. Journal of Intellectual
Capital Vol. 1 No. 1 , 33-46.
Holland, J., & Holland, J. (2010). Intellectual
Capital and Technological Innovation:
Knowledge-Based Theory and Practice. New
York: Hershey.
Horibe, F. D. (1999). Managing Knowledge
Workers: New Skills and Attitudes to Unlock
The Intellectual Capital in Your Organization.
Canada: John Wiley&Sons Canada Limited.
Ingham, J. (2007). Strategic Human Capital
Management: Creating Value Through
People. USA: Elsevier Ltd.
Intellectual Capital and Corporate Value in
Emerging Economy: Empirical Study of
Taiwanese Manufacturers. (2005). R&D
Management Vol. 35 No. 2, 187-205.
Kadir, A., & Triwahyuni, T. (2003). Pengendalian
Teknologi Informasi. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Kelly, A. (2004). The Intellectual Capital of
S c h o o l : M e a s u r i n g a n d M a n a g i n g
Knowledge, Responsibility and Reward:
Lesson from The Commercial Sector. United
Kingdom: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Komite Standar Akuntansi Pemerintahan. (2011).
Buletin Teknis Nomor 11 tentang Akuntansi
Aset Tidak Berwujud. Diambil kembali dari
http://www.ksap.org/Buletin/Bultek%20SAP
%20Nomor%2011%20ATB.pdf
Lev, B. (2001). Intangible: Management,
Measurement, and Reporting. Washington:
The Brooking Institution.
Lynch, K. (2000). Education for Citizenship: The
Need for a Major Intervention in Social and
Political Education in Ireland. CSPE
Conference. Bunratty Co.
Marr, B., & Gray, D. (2006). Strategic
Performance Management: Leveraging and
Measuring Your Intangible Value Drivers.
USA: Elsevier Ltd.
Masyhur, F. (2017). Penelitian e-Government di
Indonesia: Studi Literatur Sistematis dari
Perspektif Dimensi Pemeringkatan e-
Government Indonesia (PeGI). IPTEK-KOM,
-62.
Mouritsen, J., & et al. (2003). Intellectual Capital
Statements: The New Guidelines. Denmark:
Danish Ministry of Science Technology and
Innovation.
Mulder, M., & Winterton, J. (2017). Competence-
Based Vovational and Professional Education:
Bridging The Worlds of Work and Education.
(M. Mulder, Penyunt.) Switzerland: Springer
Nature .
Munandar, I., Pratama, A. A., & Satria, D. (2017).
Menilai Penerapan e-government di
Kemeterian/Lembaga Negara Republik
Indonesia Menggunakan Framework PeGI.
Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Tambang
Bawah Tanah.
Nugraha, J. T. (2018). E-Government dan
Pelayanan Publik (Studi Tentang Elemen
Sukses Pengembangan E-Government di
Pemerintah Kabupaten Sleman). Jurnal
Komunikasi dan Kajian Media, 32-42.
Pearce, J. A., & Robinson, R. B. (2000). Strategic
Management: Formulation, Implementation,
and Control. University of California:
Irwin/McGraw-HIll.
Petty, R. M., & et al. (2009). Intellectual Capital
and Valuation: Challenges in The Voluntary
Disclosure of Value Drivers. Journal of
Finance and Accountancy.
Roos, J., Roos, G., Dragonetti, N., & Edvinsson,
L. (1997). Intellectual Capital: Navigating Te
New Business Landscape. London: Macmillan
Press LTD.
Ross, G., & et al. (2001). Intellectual Capital
Analysis as A Strategic Tool. Startegy &
Leadership. 29 (4)., 21-26.
Satriya, E. (2006). Pentingnya Revitalisasi eg
o v e r n m e n t d i I n d o n e s i a . P ro s i d i n g
Konferensi NAsional Teknologi Informasi &
Komunikasi Untuk Indonesia. Bandung:
Institut Teknologi Bandung.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art
and Practice of The Learning Organization.
New York: Doubleday.
Sohrabi, B., & et al. (2010). Intellectual CApital
and Technological Innovation: Knowledge-
Based Theory and Practice. New York:
Hershey.
S v e i b y, & E r i c k , K . ( 1 9 9 6 ) . T h e N e w
Organizational Wealth: Managing and
Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets. San
Fransisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
The World Bank. (2002). The E-Government
Handbook For Developing Countries. (M. A.
Khalil, B. D. Lanvin, & V. Chaudhry,
Penyunt.) Center For Democracy Technology.Tseng, C., & Goo, Y. J. (2005). Intellectual
Capital and Corporate Value in Emerging
Economy Empirical Study of Taiwanese
Manufacturers. R&D Management Vol 35 No
, 187-205.
Utomo, T. W. (2016, November 5). PNS Harus
Menguasai Teknologi Informasi. Diambil
k e m b a l i d a r i B e r i t a S a t u :
https://www.beritasatu.com/nasional/397321-
pns-harus-menguasai-teknologi-informasi
World Bank, T. (2002). The e-government
Handbook for Developing Countries. Center
For Democracy Technology.
Yodmongkon, P., & Chakpitak, N. (2009).
Applying Intellectual Capital Process Model
for CReating a Defensive Protection Systemto
Local Traditional Knowledge:The Case of
Mea-Hiya Community. Electronic Journal of
Knowledge Management, 7(4), 519.
Yohana, N., & Yazid, T. P. (2014). Pemanfaatan
Website Pemerintah Kota Pekanbaru dalam
Mewujudkan Good Governance. Masyarakat
Telematika dan Informasi, 153-168.
Yunita, N. P., & Aprianto, R. D. (2018). Kondisi
Terkini Perkembangan Pelaksanaan EGovernment
di Indonesia: Analisis Website.
Seminar Nasional Teknologi Informasi dan
Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Universitas
Atmajaya.
Zyl, C. V. (2005). Structural Capital Management
Creates Sustainable Competitiveness and
Prolonged First-Mover Advantage. Acta
Commercii: Intellectual Capital Mangement
Series.
Zyl, C. V. (2005). Structural Capital Management
Creates SustainableCompetitiveness and
Prolonged First-MOver Advantages. Acta
Commercii: Intellectual Capital Management
Series.
